June 9th, 2010 | By boadurichard

This article was originally posted in December 2009 and was initially aimed at the position that every conference should have a championship game to even the playing field regard BCS title game entrance. However, with the changing climate that is college football it looks like there will be a large shake-up in the near future. I think the ideas we at 6magazine put together two years ago really do make sense, even though this setup is not an option it seems looking at future conference realignment. At the time our goal was to simply allocate the Pac-10, Big East and Big 10 each with 12 members so that all BCS conferences could have a season ending championship game giving the BCS more of a playoff feel. The reason I am doing this is to see your thoughts and opinions regarding how this particular setup would work to solve the conference issues that relevant now.
What, I don’t think it is fair is that every major conference does not have a championship game at the end of the year. The winning team of the Big 12, ACC, or SEC has to win a championship game every year. The Pac-10, Big East, and Big 10 (11 teams) do not. Essentially makes the road to a national championship easier than that of the conferences that do indeed play a championship game to determine their winner. It is really unfair when you realize that the weaker conferences in the BCS, by basic popular opinion, have an easier road to the championship game. This is a factor in why Ohio State had dominated the Big 10 for the most part of the last decade. Moreover, the same concept applies to USC which is usually the Pac-10 champion. Conference champions that are BCS eligible but do not play a conference championship game are at home while the bigger conferences are having one more war, which in college football is the safest way to make it the championship game, USC and OSU has benefited from that in recent years.
My argument is that the governing bodies of college football should mandate that all BCS conferences have a football championship game at the end of the year. The kicker here is that to have a football championship a conference must have 12 football playing institutions. Given the need for a small conference re-alignment to make this possible I will spell it out for you.
Conference
Pacific 10
Current Members
USC, UCLA, Stanford, California, Arizona, Arizona State, Washington, Washington State, Oregon, and Oregon St.
Four schools come to mind as far as likely candidates for entrance into the Pac-10. These schools are Utah, BYU, Fresno State, and Boise State. I just think it feels more natural for BYU and Utah to be the candidates to join the Conference. First of all, it keeps with the trend in the Pac-10 have two schools per state minus California of course. BYU and Utah bring the Salt Lake City market which is bigger than Boise. Furthermore, BYU and Utah are rivals so you automatically bring some tradition to the table when you add these schools instead of forcing totally odd relationships like Boise State and Fresno would illicit. I also would split the Pac-10 into two divisions Northwest and Southwest Divisions would make up the conference.
Northwest Division
Washington, Washington State, Oregon, Oregon State, BYU and California
Southwest Division
USC, UCLA, Utah, Stanford, Arizona and Arizona State.
This I think is an applicable solution for the Pac-10 with the Championship game being played every year in Phoenix, L.A. or the Bay Area.
BIG 10 Conference
Current Members
Michigan, Ohio State, Penn State, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Indiana, Michigan State, Northwestern, Illinois, and Purdue.
The Big Ten is a little easier as it really has 11 teams. If you ever take time to look at the official Big Ten Logo it has a hidden 11 in it. You ever notice that? Notre Dame is always the popular choice to add to the big ten to make it a twelve-team conference. The great thing about this is that Notre Dame is affiliated with the Big East for every other sport but football so it would only have to switch football to make the change possible while not interrupting any other sports in the conference as it stands now. The only hitch in this is the lucrative television contract with NBC that Notre Dame has. This formal pitch is being made in the name of fluidity in college football so why not give ND television rights until the end of their current contract with NBC and work with them on the next contract whether it be with NBC or not. Meaning, that ND would receive a bigger cut of TV revenues after joining the Big-10 in order for continuity to prevail in the whole college football landscape. ND would, in the year 2017 receive double payout from the BIG-10 for TV revenues if they left NBC at the end of their current contract. For fair measure, let’s give ND theses allocations for a full ten years after joining the conference afterward they would be considered a normal member and fall in line like a regular member. The great benefit of having ND in the Big Ten is all the great match-ups it would offer for the BIG-10. ND currently plays Michigan, Michigan, Purdue, and Indiana on an annual basis. Other great match-ups would include ND-Wisconsin, ND-Iowa, ND-Ohio State, and I would love to see a love rekindled which is ND-Penn State. This used to be one of the best rivalries in the country, but really lost its luster when Penn State left the ranks of the Independent and joined the Big-10 in the mid 1990’s.
The BIG 10 would now have 12 teams with the addition of ND but would keep its namesake. Furthermore, the conference would be split into Eastern and Western Divisions that would look like this:
Eastern Division
Penn State, Ohio State, Indiana, Purdue, Notre Dame, Northwestern
Western Division
Michigan, Michigan State, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois and Minnesota
I think that this alignment would be great as long as you could keep the season ending rivalries intact. Moreover, Notre Dame could play Penn State for the Nittany/Irish Trophy instead of the awkward game with Michigan State for the Land Grand Trophy. The Big 10 championship could be played in Chicago every year, which I think would be a great tradition for the new conference similar to the SEC being played in Atlanta every year.
Big East
Current Members
West Virginia, Louisville, South Florida, UConn, Syracuse, Pittsburgh, Rutgers and Cincinnati.
The Big East may well be the toughest to re-align because it only has 8 active football members and 16 in basketball. The current members of the conference are Cincinnati, UConn, Louisville, Pittsburgh, Rutgers, South Florida, and Syracuse. The need for four teams here is a tough one to fill. First of all, let’s switch Boston College in the ACC for South Florida so that we leave a lighter carbon footprint with all the traveling involved as these two schools are outliers as far as distance is concerned and it also provides more sensible regional match-ups for both schools. Therefore the new Big East would look like this: Boston College, Louisville, UConn, Cincy, Rutgers, Syracuse, Pittsburgh, and West Virginia. There are not a plethora of eligible teams left to put this scenario together so here we go, the new members of the Big East would be Temple, Buffalo, Army and Navy. There would again be two divisions, the New England and Ohio Valley. Here is how they would look:
New England:
Buffalo, Temple, BC, Syracuse, UConn, Pittsburgh
Ohio Valley:
Cincy, Rutgers, West Virginia, Army, Navy, Louisville
There would be several teams that would have to step up their game in order to be respected as a member of a legit BCS conference but Buffalo, Temple, and Army could after a few years with the backing of a new and strong conference make the progress necessary to compete with other conferences.
While we all know future realignment hinges on the decisions, Notre Dame, Nebraska, Missouri, the Pac-10 and Texas make in the coming year or week depending on who you ask I think this system will keep some type on continuity within college football. Call me a homer but I don’t like the idea of a 16 team conference it takes too much away from the game and some rivalries. Let me know what you think.
Quick Claude